Orphan Works 2008
Updates
Making your Voice Heard
Orphan Works legislation will impact all artists worldwide, directly or indirectly, so regardless of where you live, you should communicate your concern. SAA and other associations have posted resources to help make your voice heard. ...more
September 27, 2008
Bill Passes Senate; House Expected to Follow
We've now learned that the Senate bill was passed. It is troubling indeed that this legislation was pushed through in this manner, the last day of the Congressional term. As our colleagues at the Advertising Photographers of America (APA) have declared, in their email alert: "Passing controversial legislation by this process, i.e. under the radar, is deeply troubling to say the least and every Senator needs to be held accountable."
We now need to turn our attention to the House. Contact your Representative and urge them to stop the House Judiciary Committee from folding their own bill (HR5889) and moving to adopt the Senate version.
July 18, 2008
Amendments Proposed by Three Artists Groups Now Broadly Endorsed by Associations Worldwide
In April, three leading artists advocacy groups prsented a set of Amendments to the Congressional committees who are drafting Orpahan Works bills that, if adopted, would greatly improve this legislation. Since then, many fellow associastions have writen to Congress to endorse these Amendments. Read the Amendments here
July 16, 2008
Leading Photo Associations Urge Congress
to Amend Legislation
A growing chorus of concern, even outrage, about the current Orphan
Works legislation demonstrates the importance of this issue for most
photographers and other visual artists.
Meantime, representatives from organizations that include the largest share of U.S. advertising, editorial and stock photographers have been meeting with members of Congress and key staff. Their discussions have focused on seeking solutions for the problems of unidentified creative works and missing creators, while preserving constitutional protections for intellectual property.
SAA, along with the Advertising Photographers of America (APA), the National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) and Editorial Photographers
(EP) have all stated we cannot support the Orphan Works bills in their
current form. Together, these groups represent more professional media
photographers than other U.S. organizations.
In recent months, representatives from APA and NPPA have met with
members of Congress and legislative staff to express their concerns
regarding Orphan Works bills S2913 and HR5889. The photographers'
representatives offered potential solutions for limiting the
legislation to works that are truly "orphaned," for non-commercial use
by the cultural heritage sector - particularly non-profit libraries,
museums and archives.
The associations stressed the legislation must not violate
international trade agreements or cause harm to existing commercial
markets. Also, a well-crafted bill can and should maintain the rights
of working artists as they exist under current copyright law.
International photographer groups have also expressed their opposition
to the orphan works legislation in its current form. Among those groups
are the UK's Association of Photographers (AOP), FreeLens, Union des Photographes Créateurs (UPC), and the Canadian Association of Photographers and Illustrators in Communications (CAPIC).
Very vocal in their opposition are groups collectively representing
more than a quarter-million visual artists and other creators,
including leading associations in North America and Europe. More than
60 groups have endorsed an online resource, created by the Illustrator's Partnership,
that facilitates sending opposition messages to Congress. These groups
comprise a broad community of creators, including illustrators, fine
artists, graphic artists, digital artists, cartoonists and musicians.
To date, more than 100,000 artists have used this resource to contact
their senators, representatives and Judiciary Committee members.
This coalition of artists groups agrees Orphan Works legislation must be narrowly crafted to serve the needs of the cultural heritage users for whom it was originally conceived - giving them access to truly orphaned works - while protecting the copyrights and livelihoods of artists.

